Aditionally created municipalities with extended power and their position in settlement structure

Authors

  • Ing. Marek Jetmar, Ph.D. AMBIS University, Department of Economics and Management
  • Mgr. Petr Svoboda Ministry of the Interior of Czech Republic, Department of Strategic Development and Coordination of Public Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61357/sehs.v16i2.11

Keywords:

municipality with extended power, public administration, demographics, mobility, civic amenities

Abstract

At the beginning of the millennium, a second phase of territorial reform of public administration took place in the Czech Republic. It resulted in a fundamental strengthening of the combined model through the creation of a system of municipalities with extended power and the dissolution of the district offices. The newly expanded municipalities are seen as one of the basic layers where public administration and devolved performance of state government are exercised, respectively. This state is codified by Act No. 51/2020 Coll., on the Territorial Administrative Breakdown of the State.

Although the definition was intended to create administrative districts that would coincide with natural functional regions, the proposed range of towns was expanded to include additional municipalities as a result of a political decision that was taken when the laws were being negotiated.

The article focuses on the evolution of these politically formed municipalities with extended power (MEP) in view of their demographic development and the role of the commuter hub within the spatial relations in an administrative region. Also the amenities available at these centres were studied and a comparison was made with selected towns of similar size, which were proposed as MEP in the original draft, as well as those which do not have this status.

The fundamental difference identified is the reduced ability of politically chosen MEP to naturally integrate administrative territories.

References

HEMMINGS, P. (2006): Improving public-spending efficiency in Czech regions and municipalities, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 499, OECD Publishing, Paris.

HRUŠKA, L., A. HRUŠKOVÁ, I. FOLDYNOVÁ a kol. (2018). Analýza vybraných prostorových aspektů veřejné správy a zlepšení dostupnosti jejích služeb. Ostrava: PROCES – Centrum pro rozvoj obcí a regionů, s.r.o., (2018).

JETMAR, M a P.SVOBODA. (2022). Analýza politicky vzniklých obcí s rozšířenou působností. Ministerstvo vnitra.

KRAFT, S. and J, NERAD. (2019). Administrative Boundaries, Transport Accessibility and Functional Relations: a Critical Review of Administrative Regions in the Czech Republic from a Spatial Perspective. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 15.56, s. 60-76. ISSN 1842-2845.

TONEV, P., M. HALÁS and P. KLAPKA. (2018). Prostorová neurčitost funkčních regionů: porovnání pracovní dojížďky v letech 1991- 2011. In KLÍMOVÁ, V. a V. ŽÍTEK, eds. XXI. mezinárodní kolokvium o regionálních vědách. Sborník příspěvků. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2018. s. 285–292. ISBN 978-80-210-8969-3.

WICHT, A., P. KROPP and B. SCHWENGLER. (2020). Are functional regions more homogeneous than administrative regions? A test using hierarchical linear models. Papers in Regional Science, 99.1, s. 135-164. ISSN 1056-8190.

www.mvcr.cz. Koncepce Klientsky orientovaná veřejná správa 2030 (2020). Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky. [online] Dostupné z: https://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/koncepce-klientsky-orientovana-verejna-sprava-2030.aspx [Cit. 2022-07-07].

Zákon č. 51/2020 Sb. Zákon o územně správním členění státu a o změně souvisejících zákonů (zákon o územně správním členění státu)

Zákon č. 314/2002 Sb. Zákon o stanovení obcí s pověřeným obecním úřadem a obcí s rozšířenou působností (v původním znění).

Published

2022-12-23

How to Cite

Jetmar, M., & Svoboda, P. (2022). Aditionally created municipalities with extended power and their position in settlement structure. Socio-Economic and Humanities Studies, 16(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.61357/sehs.v16i2.11