Retirement age in the context of public finance implications

Authors

  • Ing. Jaroslav Šetek, Ph.D. Faculty of Economics, University of South BohemiaStudentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
  • Ing. Jiří Alina, Ph.D. aculty of Economics, University of South BohemiaStudentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
  • Bc. David Bajer Faculty of Economics, University of South BohemiaStudentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61357/sehs.v10i2.54

Keywords:

depreciation, human capital, retirement age

Abstract

The aging of population, which is a pan-European as well as Czech trend, will have a significant impact after 2030, fundamentally affecting public finances. For this reason, a possible extension of the retirement age is also being considered. So far, two alternatives have been presented - retirement age of 65–67 years after 2035 and a maximum age limit of 65 years. The age limit of 65 is unacceptable for some professions due to the accelerated depreciation of human capital. Therefore, economically efficient retirement schemes should be set up for early retirement for professions with significant physical and mental stress, hazards (mining, metallurgy, construction, airmen, rescuers, etc.). At the same time, the onset of the Industry 4.0 era, coupled with extensive technological changes, complicates the forecast for anchoring the retirement age. In particular, the situation requires addressing the current problems that the Czech economy and its pension system struggle with. From an economic point of view, it is a reduction of the retirement age for particularly demanding professions. This issue concerns the macroeconomic context with appropriate implications for public resources. Therefore, the paper requires an interdisciplinary approach to the processing of social sciences (especially economics, financial theory, social security law, sociology, demography).

References

Beck, U. (2007). Policy Invention: The Reflexive Modernization Theory. Praha. Sociologické nakladatelství.

Becker, G. S. (1997). The theory of preferences. Praha. Liberální institut, Grada Publishing.

Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Second edition. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Biskup, J., Voříšek, V. (2005). Pension insurance. 1st edition. Praha: Eurolex, Bohemia.

Džbánková, Z., & Sirůček, P. (2013). Rationality in Economics- Male and Female Perspectives. 7th International Days of Statistics and Economics Location, 375–387.

Loužek, M. (2014). Pension reform. Praha: Karolinum.

Novotná, M., & Volek, T. (2014). Labour as a factor of production in the context of gross value added growth in sector A. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica (SAB). Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. (2), 129–135.

Pavelka, T. (2017), Long-term unemployment in the Czech Republic and the effect of distraints. 11th International Days of Statistics and Economics. Praguea. Czech Republic. 1153–1162.

Šetek, J. (2005). Provision of members of power ministries in selected NATO and EU member states. Výzkumný ústav práce a sociálních věcí, Praha.

Šetek, J. (2011). Legislative reform of the armed forces and security forces and personnel policy change. Labor and Social Policy No. 2, Vol. 8, 5.

Šetek, J. (2011). The necessity to reform leaching requirements. Policeman No. 2, 2011, Vol. 8. 23.

Šetek, J. (2011). Taxation of leachate contributions. Labor and Social Policy No. 4, Vol. 8, 5.

Šetek, J. (2011) Employment of Extraction Benefit Beneficiaries in State Administration. Labor and Social Policy No. 7-8, Vol. 8, 5.

Šetek, J. (2011). Possibilities of recruitment of emergency medical personnel into service. Labor and Social Policy No. 10, Vol. 8, 4.

Šetek, J. (2011) Competition of service conditions on the labor market. Labor and Social Policy No. 1, 2011, vol. 8, 5.

Šetek, J. (2011) Provision of retired persons under one law and one authority. Labor and Social Policy No. 5, Vol. 8, 5.

Wawrosz, P.; & Valenčik, R. (2014). How to Describe Affinities in Redistribution Systems. 18th International Conference CURRENT Trends in Public Sector Research. 212–220.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-15

How to Cite

Šetek, J., Alina, J., & Bajer, D. (2019). Retirement age in the context of public finance implications. Socio-Economic and Humanities Studies, 10(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.61357/sehs.v10i2.54